Origin vs Steam, or, What?

Ok, EA, some tips. If you're going to pull all your games down from the best online content provider for gamers, you might want to have a viable replacement. For some weird reason, I don't consider it very good when I get ~70% of the DL speeds I do for Steam. Yeah, it's probably good that more people are looking into digital retail channels for games. Even though something like 0% of us believe that that convenience is actually any more than a weak excuse for pirates, it's still convenient.

But please, do it properly? Another thing. You should probably have a system that isn't clunky, awkward, and stupid to replace the handy Steam client. Hate to tell you this, but centralizing us on a damned web browser, on a site that loads slower than Steam pages, and even forcing us to LAUNCH from the web browser, is kind of annoying. Especially when we have to relaunch the game to switch servers.

I mean, is it really so hard for gaming's monopolistic, monolithic evil empire to hire maybe ONE whole person who actually plays games in some sort of decision making capacity? I mean, this is in the category of idiocy. The only reason people use origin for online purchase at all is because you force us to. Here's a news flash. We like Steam as a whole service, not just as a store. You didn't improve on it, and you suck.

By the way, if you try to take away my access to my games because you don't like this opinion, like you did to the one guy after DA2 came out, I promise to sue you so bad your stockholders mama feels it.

Piracy: Or, Biting the Hand That Feeds You.

Ok, I've heard all the completely retarded excuses for stealing software, movies, music, and whatever else happens to tickle your fancy. They're all bullshit. You aren't some nifty political movement, sticking it to the evil corporate empire. You aren't protesting intrusive DRM, and if they released a demo, you'd still steal the full game.

Notice I'm saying steal. Not pirate, not copy, not download, not torrent. I've heard that load of crap too, and you make Downs seem smart if you think people are buying the arguments about it not being stealing. Shall we check the definition of steal, and see?

1.

to take (the property of another or others) without permission or right, especially secretly or by force: A pickpocket stole his watch.

2.

to appropriate (ideas, credit, words, etc.) without right or acknowledgment.

First two definitions for steal. Neither of those mentions physical possession. Intellectual PROPERTY. Rocket science, much? Hell, the second one even covers non-physical stuff, like ideas, or credit... So, apparently, you can steal without denying the rightful owner a physical object. All you have to do is to take something without permission or right. That sounds like what you call Piracy, to me.

So, my next question. If it's a protest of whatever, for whatever (made up) reason, you pretty much acknowledge you're getting it the wrong way, or else the act of getting it wouldn't be a protest, right? The only other way to protest would be to not get it at all. So, if you succeeded in justifying it as just being a copy, and not stealing, it would actually remove any value from the notion of protesting, because your action wasn't wrong at all, and you got the product.

Let's face it. The majority of people aren't stealing a game to play for free to see if they want to buy it. How do I know? Because that's moronic. There's other ways to find out if you want to play a game, especially in this day and age. You aren't stealing it because of intrusive DRM, either. I'd guess something like 0.001% of the people who steal a product to get around intrusive DRM have encountered an issue and known it at the time. Even counting me and all my friends, the worst issues I've seen with DRM have been occasional new CDs not playing in old players. I've never had China take over my computer to sell to the Daleks or whatever, as a result of installing a game.

The only thing you're really protesting is the right of people to earn money by selling games. Yes, you deny money to greedy stockholders. Those game companies wouldn't exist without greedy stockholders, you idiot. The greedy stockholders are all rich and can move their money anyways, so the people you're hurting are the people who lose jobs. The people who make it happen. The common people. So, you're just a prick, you thief.

Long story short, you're making the games industry less profitable than it should be, and now we get nothing but shitty console ports for PC. Thanks a lot, assholes. Rot in whatever hell is most applicable to your religious preference. Yes, they still make money off the buyers, the honest people. But we pay MORE for games, they put worse and worse DRM in place, and everything you claim to be fighting comes as a direct result of your actions. Or at least is justified by them. So go fuck yourselves.