Sampling Different Types of Anti Aliasing

Anyone who pays much attention to settings that can be forced in drivers or games has probably noticed by now that there's a whole lot of different types of Anti-Aliasing. The main two things people know about it though, are that it murders GPU and VRAM, and that it makes things look smoother. The method behind the madness, however, is generally regarded with the same apprehension usually reserved for Voodoo rituals.

In a recent post, I discussed the benefits of Anti-Aliasing and how they apply to the average gamer. That doesn't change the fact that there are a whole helluva heap of acronyms, and apparently some of them are easier than others, and they theoretically all do the same thing, in different ways, using different amounts of resources, and for some reason, we always refer to it in multiples, like x4, x8, and so on.

Just as a quick recap, Aliasing is what we call it when a line that isn't directly vertical or horizontal is depicted in pixels, and gets a little staircase effect. Anti-Aliasing is just there to make your eye think that isn't happening to things look pretty.

One of the earliest forms of AA in gaming was SuperSampling AA, or SSAA. It just happened to be a bit too brutal for the graphics cards of the day, and got phased out for a while, but is making a comeback now. Supersampling basically means rendering the scene at a higher resolution so that each pixel you'll see is composed of more pixels. These pixels then get blended based on various algorithms, which were either determined by throwing darts or by someone way smarter than me. There's also adaptive supersampling, which mostly seems to involve a combination of witchcraft and tarot to determine which pixels actually need to be full supersampled, which means your GPU takes longer to explode trying to do all that work.

FSAA, or Full Scene AntiAliasing, is just another name for Supersampling, since they needed something new to call it to not scare the pants off of people who watched SSAA turn games into slideshows back in the day.

MultiSampling AntiAliasing, or MSAA, one of the versions we see more often, is essentially a refinement of SSAA that uses less GPU horsepower by only sampling certain portions of textures and polygons, based on depth and location in the scene. The best I've managed to understand the specifics imply some sort of mathematical formla involving the cosine of the square root of negative infinity minus pi. Or some such nonsense. Basically, it isn't quite as pretty, does part of the same job, and beats less of the shit out of your graphics card. Got it? Good, now help me figure it out, it gets more confusing every time I try to understand it.

Of course, there's still one thing we haven't covered. Where the hell does the x4, x8, etc. come from? Well, roughly, that tells it how many "samples" you want rendered for pixels that it decides need samples rendered for. Then it promptly goes back to the roulette wheel to decide which pixels to make prettier, and hey presto, it automagically looks better!

I hope this has been either educational or entertaining, if not go back and re-read the parts that confused you, (paragraphs 1-7?) while I go take a tylenol.

Anatomy of an E-Sport

E-Sports are starting to be something that people occasionally hear about. Big international gaming tournaments, with prizes of thousands, or tens of thousands of dollars. That's a lot of damn money for a video game. Especially if you're a top player, salaried, on a team, we ain't in momma's basement no more.

Just a couple of days ago, I was sitting in a sports bar, watching the finals of Major League Gaming's Orlando event. Dozens of other people there, cheering for some awesome Starcraft 2 players, having a couple of beers, yelling, big screen TV's, the works. This is getting big, and with the increasing emphasis of technology in the modern world, it's not going anywhere.

So what makes for a game that can be an E-Sport? We have various games to look at, Halo, Call of Duty, League of Legends, DOTA, HoN, Starcraft 2. Not all of these games seem to have much in common. From the shooters, to the real time strategy, to the Multiplayer Online Battle Arena.

The first factor they need, obviously, is a means of direct competition. A means of pitting people against each other, rather than just the game. This lets you see whose tactics, strategy, mechanics, and game knowledge is actually superior in a tangible sort of way. Team play isn't required, but it does add some depth to some games.

Next, they need little to no random factors. People don't watch professional Yahtzee, for some weird reason. Might have something to do with the fact that random chance can have too much of an adverse effect on skill. I still don't have a clue why people enjoy watching poker tournaments. Sure, there's some cool dynamics, but when the best player can be crushed by the vagaries of fate, it's kind of detrimental to enjoyment, at least for me.

Another important notion is a high skill cap. If it's easy to keep pace and do everything, it takes challenge out. This is why certain games, particularly fighters and shooters, will occasionally put limits on what is allowed in competitive play, whether it's disallowing specific weapons, characters, or anything else. This is there so that something that requires demonstrably less skill to be effective doesn't skew the competition by forcing everyone to use to stupid overpowered stuff to be competitive at all.

Also important is a certain amount of tension. There needs to be some sort of edge, a palpable means of pressure building on the players. American football has third and long, or fourth and inches, field goals, and other moments where one exceptional play can make or break a team. If the game is capable of hanging by a thread, or balancing on a narrow ledge, where it can go either way at any second, it draws in attention.

Finally, for an E-Sport to be successful, there needs to be some sort of exterior community. People gathering, whether it's online or in sports bars, at tournaments or in houses, there needs to be sufficient gatherings of people to draw the sponsors. Without sponsors, you don't have player salaries, you don't have big tournament payoffs.

There may be other factors you can think of, but this is, I think, the true essence of an E-Sport. Just about anything that combines these factors is likely to succeed.